We translate a chemical into what it actually does — then find every industry in the world that needs that.
PROWL — Pattern Recognition Of White-space Leads — does not search your molecule's name. It works out the substance's functional language, reads the world's most difficult commercial and technical evidence for anywhere that function is already wanted, and tests each candidate for whether it is real, worth pursuing and winnable. A person makes every judgement.
A chemical's name tells you almost nothing about where it can sell.
This is the step that is usually missing, and it is the one that decides everything after it. Searching a trade name or a CAS number returns the markets you already serve, because those are the people who already use that word. The markets you do not serve do not call it what you call it. So the first job is to stop working in names and start working in function.
Step 1Identity
What the substance actually is, resolved against the registers: the identifiers, the chemical family, the forms it is genuinely sold in — and which of those forms have quietly ceased.
Step 2Function
What it does. Interfacial behaviour, thermal and oxidative stability, biological activity, compatibility. Properties as measured and published, never as claimed. This is the language industries actually buy in.
Step 3Industrial use, worldwide
Who needs that function, in any industry and any region — not one sector, and not one continent. The same behaviour is called different things in adhesives, in agriculture, in energy and in personal care, and each of those names has to be recognised as the same thing.
Step 4Market, in your words
Uses are grouped into markets through your own ontology, so what comes back is expressed the way your business describes itself — and what you already serve is subtracted before anything is ranked.
Most of the evidence is hard to read on purpose.
This is not a matter of volume alone. The documents that decide the question are written in four different professional registers, none of them written for a commercial reader, and each has to be understood on its own terms before anything can be compared across them.
Legal and regulatory
Registration dossiers, consent orders, restriction notices, food-contact inventories. Written by lawyers for regulators. Precise, deliberately narrow, and full of consequences that are never stated as conclusions — a declared use, a ceased identity and a missing entry each mean something quite different.
Patents
Drafted to claim as broadly as possible while disclosing as little as the law allows. Your chemistry usually appears as somebody else's input, unnamed, described by function or by family. Filings show intent rather than revenue, and are read that way.
Academic literature
Written for specialists in a field that is probably not yours, with the commercially decisive result sitting in a methods section or a supplementary table rather than the abstract.
Trade and market data
Customs and volume data carry numbers without narrative; research houses carry narrative without a register behind it. Each is recorded for what it is — verified in a register, or asserted by someone selling a report — and the two are never blended into one confident sentence.
The point is the range. Spanning the globe, across every industry rather than one — because the sector that needs your molecule is by definition not the sector you already sell to, it is probably not on your continent, and nobody in your building is subscribed to its journals.
Discover — find the opportunities
Public sources. The AI reads and translates; a person judges.
1Your chemical
Its identity, and what you sell today.
2Independent sources
Use data, regulators, patents, literature, trade data and the open web — eight kinds of public source.
3Evidence, not summaries
Each use becomes a record: the sentence, the document, a live link.
4Your markets subtracted
Grouped in your language. What you already serve is set aside and never shown back to you as a discovery.
Qualify — build the business case
Three questions, answered from named public sources — open sources before paid.
Is it real?Does it exist at scale?
And do independent sources agree that it does?
Is it worth it?As-is, or with work?
Does it sell as the molecule stands, or does it need formulation work first? Those are two different sales.
Can we win?The route in.
Who buys, who is there already, the route in, and the demand driver behind it.
A ranked list is not a plan.
What comes out of Qualify is not a score. It is the beginning of a commercial strategy for expansion into that market.
The sale, named
Does it sell as the molecule stands, or does it need formulation work first? Those are two different sales, to two different buyers, on two different timescales.
The route in
Direct to the formulator, or through specialty distribution. Who is incumbent, what they hold, and where the window is — measured in filings per year rather than in sentiment.
What is blocked, and why
Blocked markets are reported too, with what opening them would take. A closed door with a named lock is more useful than an open door that isn't there.
The study ends. The library doesn't.
Most market work ends as a slide deck, and what was learned getting there is lost. PROWL ends as a structured library your company keeps — written in your own business vocabulary, every entry carrying its source and the date it was read. That library is what makes the second chemistry easier than the first.
Your vocabulary, governed and versioned
How uses are grouped into markets your way, why your served business must be subtractable, and how changes are proposed, reviewed and logged.
Accelerated and sustainedTurning this into a cadence, not a project
Why adjacent growth is normally done once and then never again, and what it does to the P&L when it runs continuously.
A market you looked at once is a market you looked at once.
Evidence goes stale. A lead that was real in March can be taken, priced out or regulated away by September, and nothing about the original report will tell you. So PROWL keeps walking — on a cadence, against the same sources, reporting only what actually moved.
The cadenceLive leads every 30 days
Leads still in play are re-walked monthly; everything else quarterly. A market you already sell into is never re-walked — news cannot overturn the fact that you are already there.
The signalMovement, not rewording
Each walk is compared against the last on the evidence itself — the quoted source text, not our summary of it. A fact described in different words is not a change, and is not reported.
The honestyWhat we could not check
Every summary names the sources that could not be read this time. “We looked and found nothing” and “we could not look” are different facts, and you get told which one you have.
See it applied to two real chemicals
81 candidate markets for one established chemical; 20 for a biosurfactant. New applications for molecules already on sale, each traceable to its evidence.
StartStart with one chemistry
A low-cost test on one product, worked end to end and judged on what comes back.